International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Science (IJDOS)  /  Special Issue on "Dental Abnormalities and Oral Health"  /  IJDOS-2377-8075-S10-02-0022

Association Of Age And Gender In Patients Undergoing Non Vital Bleaching In Endodontically Treated Teeth


Sahil Choudhari1, Subash Sharma2*, Jaiganesh Ramamurthy3

1 Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Science, Saveetha University, India.
2 Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute Of Medical and Technical Science, Saveetha University, India.
3 Professor and Head, Department of Periodontics, Senior Lecturer, Department of Periodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.


*Corresponding Author

Subash Sharma,
Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute Of Medical and Technical Science, Saveetha University, India.
E-mail: subash@saveetha.com

Received: November 08, 2020 Accepted: November 23, 2020; Published: November 30, 2020

Citation:Sahil Choudhari, Subash Sharma, Jaiganesh Ramamurthy. Association Of Age And Gender In Patients Undergoing Non Vital Bleaching In Endodontically Treated Teeth. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2020;S10:02:0022:120-124. doi: dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-SI02-0100022

Copyright: Subash Sharma© 2020. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



Abstract

Discolouration of endodontically treated teeth may occur as the result of a number of circumstances. The bleaching of discolored non-vital teeth is an important phase of endodontic therapy and is a low-risk routine treatment for improving esthetics. The aim of the study was to find out the prevalence of non-vital bleaching and its association between age, gender and tooth number. 86000 patient records at a Private Dental College were reviewed between June 2019 to March 2020. Our study included all the people who had undergone non-vital bleaching treatment. A total of 13 non-vital bleaching procedures were done. The collected data was tabulated using microsoft excel and analysed using SPSS. Incomplete data was excluded from the study. Statistical analysis was done using a chi-square test. In the present study, we observed that males reported with higher incidence for non-vital bleaching procedures. (p>0.05) Tooth number 22 (p>0.05) most commonly involved tooth. Maximum number of teeth were restored with composite as final restoration post non-vital bleaching (p>0.05) Within the limitations of the study, tooth number 22 was the most commonly involved tooth in non-vital bleaching, males reported with higher incidence for non-vital bleaching procedure and composite was used most commonly as final restoration post non-vital bleaching. There was no significant difference between age, gender and tooth number in relation to non-vital bleaching.



1.Keywords
2.Introduction
3.Materials and Methods
4.Results and Discussion
5.Conclusion
6.Author Contribution
7.Acknowledgements
8.References

Keywords

Discolouration; Bleaching; Non-Vital Teeth; Esthetics.


Introduction

Dental caries are easily detectable and reversible at an early stage [28]. Bacteria play a major role in the formation and progression of pulpal and periapical diseases [23]. MMPs and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) partially regulate the inflammatory pulpal tissue destruction [35]. Dental trauma is one of the most commonly seen injuries in the general population involving teeth and other surrounding structures [20]. If a patient only reports with chipped teeth or localised defects, veneers are usually the material of choice due to a conservative, esthetic approach as they are tooth coloured restorations in order to give the patient a perfect smile [31]. Pulp canal obliteration occurs commonly following traumatic injuries to teeth [21]. Other causes leading to pulpal involvement includes dental erosion which is caused by acid attacks, either from extrinsic sources such as consumption of acidic beverages [22]. Non-carious loss of tooth structure in the cervical region is a very common clinical condition with the fact that the prevalence and severity of these lesions have been found to increase with age. The consequences of these lesions are sensitivity and high wear [18].

Discoloration of non-vital teeth is an aesthetic deficiency that requires an effective treatment. Attractive teeth have always been a patient’s primary need. What most people want are teeth that make them look healthier, younger and more attractive. The sharp rise in the acceptance and demand for treatment of discolored teeth, to make them brighter, is becoming a big part of the practice. The most common cause of tooth discoloration is intracoronal blood decomposition [27, 39]. When the discoloration originates from within the pulp chamber, the treatment should also start from there itself [2, 3, 5].

Diagnosing the exact pulpal status by direct examination is uncertain due to the fact that the pulp is enclosed within a hard tissue. In order to identify the actual pulp status surrogate test must be performed [19]. One of the important aspects of root canal therapy is to control pain after treatment [29]. The cleaning and shaping of root canal space is one of the most important and fundamental aspects of endodontic therapy. Preserving the original canal shape by using less invasive methods lead to better endodontic outcomes [30]. Irrigants play a crucial role in debridement and disinfection of the root canal space. Since microorganisms have been established as the sole entity responsible for initiating pulpal and periapical pathologies, mechanical instrumentation alone may not be sufficient to remove bacteria and necrotic tissue from root canals owing to the complex anatomy [33]. Saline can provide a flush out of debris and not the disinfection. Hence, the usage of disinfectants for irrigation is mandatory and universally accepted [34]. Antibacterial effects of chemomechanical procedures can be enhanced by the subsequent placement of an antimicrobial intracanal medication, particularly in those cases of exudation, haemorrhage, perforation, root resorption, trauma or incomplete root formation [24].

Incomplete root canal therapy means that necrotic debris in the pulp horns, filling materials located in the pulp chamber and endodontic sealer that lines the chamber walls could cause discoloration or a change in translucency [10, 11]. The majority of post-endodontic discolouration is caused by the failure of the operator to remove blood or other organic material from the pulp chamber during treatment [9]. Discoloration associated with pulpal involvement can be caused by intrapulpal hemorrhage (in which case it is pink or brown), necrotic pulpal tissue, secondary dentin formation (yellowish), and internal resorption (pink spot) [5, 6, 16].

Tooth discoloration varies in etiology, severity, location, appearance and affinity to tooth structure [12]. It can be classified as intrinsic, extrinsic, or a combination of both, according to its location and etiology. The principal causes of extrinsic discolouration are chromogens derived from habitual intake of dietary sources, such as wine, coffee, tea, carrots, oranges, licorice, chocolate, or from tobacco, mouth rinses, or plaque on the tooth surface [15]. Intrinsic causes include, systemic causes: 1) drug-related like tetracycline, 2) metabolic like dystrophic calcification and fluorosis, and 3) genetic which includes congenital erythropoietic porphyria, cystic fibrosis of the pancreas, hyperbilirubinemia, amelogenesis imperfecta, and dentinogenesis imperfecta. Local causes are 1) pulpal necrosis, 2) intrapulpal hemorrhage, 3) remnants of pulp tissue after endodontic therapy, 4) endodontic materials, 5) coronal filling materials, 6) resorption of root, and 7) aging [40].

Indications for internal bleaching are discoloration of pulpal origin, dentin stains, and stains not amenable to extracoronal bleaching. Contraindications to internal bleaching are superficial enamel stains that are superficial, enamel formation defect, severe loss of dentin, presence of caries, and discoloured composites [16]. The aim of the study was to find out the occurrence of non-vital bleaching and its association with age, gender and tooth number.


Materials And Methods

The setting for this study was a university setting. 86000 patient records at a private dental college were reviewed between June 2019 to March 2020. Our study included all the people who had undergone non-vital bleaching treatment. A total of 13 non-vital bleaching procedures were done. Cross verification of data was done using photographs and RVGs. Data was reviewed by an external reviewer. To minimize sampling bias, all the available data was included in the study.

Data collected included name, age, gender, tooth number and final restorative material used after non vital bleaching. The collected data was tabulated using microsoft excel and analysed using SPSS. Differential (frequency distribution and percentage) and inferential (chi-square test) statistics were done.


Results And Discussion

In our study, we observed that males reported with higher incidence for non-vital bleaching procedures. (p>0.05) Tooth number 22 (p>0.05) most commonly involved tooth. Maximum number of teeth were restored with composite as final restoration post non-vital bleaching. (p>0.05).

Clinically, when a patient has a non-vital discolored tooth, the dentist must make a decision to take one of three approaches excluding extraction: to leave the tooth alone; to bleach it; or to restore it with a crown. If the decision to bleach the tooth is made, the particular bleaching procedure selected is probably based largely on empirical data, such as personal preference, instructor bias, and previous clinical experience, with little scientific data supporting that decision.

In our study, 13 samples of non-vital bleaching procedures were evaluated to find out the association between age, gender and tooth number commonly involved with the procedure. Also, restorative material used for final restoration post non-vital bleaching was noted. Age groups had no significance in our study. More number of males underwent non-vital bleaching. (92%) Upper left lateral incisor was the most commonly involved tooth in this procedure (38%) but both upper central incisors together had a higher incidence. (53%)

Reports on bleaching discolored non vital teeth were first described during the middle of the 19th century [38], advocating different chemical agents [17]. Initially, oxalic acid was used, until the tooth bleaching effect of hydrogen peroxide was discovered in 1884 [14]. However, it wasn’t until 1951 that hydrogen peroxide was used to bleach non vital teeth. The bleaching of nonvital teeth is a minimally invasive intervention which, if performed correctly, bears only slight risks [26]. Over the years, bleaching by oxidation has been the preferred method because of its simplicity and more certain results. There have been two preferred bleaching agents, a 30% to 35% aqueous solution of hydrogen peroxide and powdered sodium perborate. They have been used either alone or in combination [25]. Two basic techniques have been widely used to bleach discolored pulpless teeth, the thermocatalytic and the walking bleach techniques. The only difference between the two techniques is the method of effecting the release of nascent oxygen from the chemicals [13].

In a study done by Abbott P et al, 203 patients with a total of 255 teeth were included in his study. Of the 203 patients, 46 % were males and 54 % were females which was contrary to the results in our study. The most common age range of the patients was 11-20 years although age was not significantly related to the cause of discolouration, the colour or the number of applications of bleach required. Of the teeth that required bleaching, 91 per cent were maxillary teeth, predominantly central (69 per cent) and lateral (20.4 per cent) incisors. Only 8.2 per cent of the teeth were mandibular teeth, and there was only one posterior tooth included in his study [1].

The distribution of specific teeth types encountered in our study is consistent with the distribution of teeth requiring internal bleaching reported in other studies [10, 16, 4]. It also correlates to the typical distribution of teeth reported in dental trauma studies [8].

In 1996, one manufacturer (Ultradent Products, South Jordan, UT, USA) suggested the use of 10% carbamide peroxide applied in a tray for a tooth prepared for the traditional walking bleach technique. This technique is called inside-outside bleaching as the bleaching takes place simultaneously within and outside the tooth. Several authors have reported that this technique can be successfully used for bleaching non vital teeth [32].

After bleaching, the access cavity should be restored with a resin composite, which is bonded by means of the acid-etch technique to enamel and dentin. This avoids recontamination with bacteria and staining substances and improves the stability of the tooth. A sound restoration with sealed dentinal tubules is a prerequisite to successful bleaching therapy [2]. Some authors recommend using resin composites with lighter shades to compensate for bleaching that was not completely successful. The adhesive strength of resin composites and glass-ionomer cements to bleached enamel and dentin is temporarily reduced [36, 2]. It is less likely that changes in the enamel structure might influence resin composite adhesion [37]. Nevertheless, the appearance of the hybrid layer in bleached enamel is less regular and distinct than in unbleached enamel. This might explain why access cavities of bleached teeth that are restored with resin composite occasionally show marginal leakage [7].

The limitations of our study were that it was an institutional based study, the duration of cases taken into account was only 1 year and small sample size. Future scope includes taking a larger population into account and populations from different geographical locations.



Graph 1. Frequency distribution of various post endodontic therapy.



Graph 2. Frequency distribution of remaining tooth structure.



Graph 3. Frequency distribution of the age of patients.


Conclusion

Within the limitations of the study, maxillary left lateral incisor was the most commonly involved tooth in non-vital bleaching, males reported with higher incidence for non-vital bleaching procedure and composite was used most commonly as final restoration after non-vital bleaching. There was no significant difference between age, gender and tooth number in relation to non-vital bleaching.


References

  1. Abbott P, Heah SY. Internal bleaching of teeth: an analysis of 255 teeth. Aust Dent J. 2009 Dec;54(4):326-33. Pubmed PMID: 20415931.
  2. Abou-Rass M. Long-term prognosis of intentional endodontics and internal bleaching of tetracycline-stained teeth. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1998 Oct;19(10):1034-8, 1040-2, 1044 passim. Pubmed PMID: 10371886.
  3. al-Nazhan S. External root resorption after bleaching: a case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1991 Nov;72(5):607-9. Pubmed PMID: 1745520.
  4. Amato M, Scaravilli MS, Farella M, Riccitiello F. Bleaching teeth treated endodontically: long-term evaluation of a case series. J Endod. 2006 Apr;32(4):376-8. Pubmed PMID: 16554217.
  5. Baratieri LN, Ritter AV, Monteiro S Jr, Caldeira de Andrada MA, Cardoso Vieira LC. Nonvital tooth bleaching: guidelines for the clinician. Quintessence Int. 1995 Sep;26(9):597-608. Pubmed PMID: 8602439.
  6. Barghi N. Making a clinical decision for vital tooth bleaching: at-home or in-office? Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1998 Aug;19(8):831-8; quiz 840. Pubmed PMID: 9918107.
  7. Barkhordar RA, Kempler D, Plesh O. Effect of nonvital tooth bleaching on microleakage of resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int. 1997 May;28(5):341-4. Pubmed PMID: 9452698.
  8. Bastone EB, Freer TJ, McNamara JR. Epidemiology of dental trauma: a review of the literature. Aust Dent J. 2000 Mar;45(1):2-9. Pubmed PMID: 10846265.
  9. Boksman L, Jordan RE, Skinner DH. Non-vital bleaching--internal and external. Aust Dent J. 1983 Jun;28(3):149-52. Pubmed PMID: 6579927.
  10. BROWN G. FACTORS INFLUENCING SUCCESSFUL BLEACHING OF THE DISCOLORED ROOT-FILLED TOOTH. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1965 Aug;20:238-44. Pubmed PMID: 14319600.
  11. van der Burgt TP, Plasschaert AJ. Bleaching of tooth discoloration caused by endodontic sealers. J Endod. 1986 Jun;12(6):231-4. Pubmed PMID: 3461108.
  12. Dahl JE, Pallesen U. Tooth bleaching--a critical review of the biological aspects. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2003;14(4):292-304. Pubmed PMID: 12907697.
  13. Frank A. Bleaching of vital and nonvital teeth. InPathways of the pulp 1980 (pp. 568-569). CV Mosby Co, St. Louis.
  14. Goldstein RE. In-office bleaching: where we came from, where we are today. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997 Apr;128 Suppl:11S-15S. pubmed PMID: 9120138.
  15. Hattab FN, Qudeimat MA, al-Rimawi HS. Dental discoloration: an overview. J Esthet Dent. 1999;11(6):291-310. Pubmed PMID: 10825865.
  16. Holmstrup G, Palm AM, Lambjerg-Hansen H. Bleaching of discoloured root-filled teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1988 Oct;4(5):197-201. Pubmed PMID: 3248577.
  17. Howell RA. Bleaching discoloured root-filled teeth. Br Dent J. 1980 Mar 18;148(6):159-62. Pubmed PMID: 6928778.
  18. Hussainy SN, Nasim I, Thomas T, Ranjan M. Clinical performance of resinmodified glass ionomer cement, flowable composite, and polyacid-modified resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions: One-year follow-up. J Conserv Dent. 2018 Sep-Oct;21(5):510-515. Pubmed PMID: 30294112.
  19. Janani K, Palanivelu A, Sandhya R. Diagnostic accuracy of dental pulse oximeter with customized sensor holder, thermal test and electric pulp test for the evaluation of pulp vitality: an in vivo study. Brazilian Dental Science. 2020 Jan 31;23(1):8-p.
  20. Jose J, Subbaiyan H. Different treatment modalities followed by dental practitioners for ellis class 2 fracture–A questionnaire-based survey. The Open Dentistry Journal. 2020 Feb 18;14(1).
  21. Kumar D, Antony SD. Calcified canal and negotiation-A review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018 Aug 1;11(8):3727-30.
  22. Nandakumar M, Nasim I. Comparative evaluation of grape seed and cranberry extracts in preventing enamel erosion: An optical emission spectrometric analysis. J Conserv Dent. 2018 Sep-Oct;21(5):516-520. Pubmed PMID: 30294113.
  23. Manohar MP, Sharma S. A survey of the knowledge, attitude, and awareness about the principal choice of intracanal medicaments among the general dental practitioners and nonendodontic specialists. Indian J Dent Res. 2018 Nov-Dec;29(6):716-720. Pubmed PMID: 30588997.
  24. Noor SS. Chlorhexidine: Its properties and effects. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016 Oct 1;9(10):1755.
  25. Nutting EB. A new combination for bleaching teeth. J South Calif Dent Assoc. 1963;31:289-91.
  26. PEARSON HH. Successful bleaching without secondary discolouration. J Can Dent Assoc (Tor). 1951 Apr;17(4):200-1. pubmed PMID: 14824229.
  27. Rajakeerthi R, Nivedhitha MS. Natural Product as the Storage medium for an avulsed tooth–A Systematic Review. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. 2019;22(2):249-56.
  28. Rajendran R, Kunjusankaran RN, Sandhya R, Anilkumar A, Santhosh R, Patil SR. Comparative evaluation of remineralizing potential of a paste containing bioactive glass and a topical cream containing casein phosphopeptide- amorphous calcium phosphate: An in vitro study. Pesquisa brasileira em odontopediatria e clinica integrada. 2019;19.
  29. Ramamoorthi S, Nivedhitha MS, Divyanand MJ. Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain after using endodontic needle and EndoActivator during root canal irrigation: A randomised controlled trial. Aust Endod J. 2015 Aug;41(2):78-87. Pubmed PMID: 25195661.
  30. Ramanathan S, Solete P. Cone-beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of Root Canal Preparation using Various Rotary Instruments: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015 Nov 1;16(11):869-72. Pubmed PMID: 26718293.
  31. Ravinthar K. Recent advancements in laminates and veneers in dentistry. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018 Feb 1;11(2):785-7.
  32. Settembrini L, Gultz J, Kaim J, Scherer W. A technique for bleaching nonvital teeth: inside/outside bleaching. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997 Sep;128(9):1283- 4. Pubmed PMID: 9297951.
  33. Siddique R, Sureshbabu NM, Somasundaram J, Jacob B, Selvam D. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of precipitate formation following interaction of chlorhexidine with sodium hypochlorite, neem, and tulsi. J Conserv Dent. 2019 Jan-Feb;22(1):40-47. Pubmed PMID: 30820081.
  34. Teja KV, Ramesh S. Shape optimal and clean more. Saudi Endodontic Journal. 2019 Sep 1;9(3):235.
  35. Teja KV, Ramesh S, Priya V. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-3 gene expression in inflammation: A molecular study. J Conserv Dent. 2018 Nov- Dec;21(6):592-596. Pubmed PMID: 30546201.
  36. Titley KC, Torneck CD, Smith DC, Adibfar A. Adhesion of composite resin to bleached and unbleached bovine enamel. J Dent Res. 1988 Dec;67(12):1523-8. Pubmed PMID: 3198853.
  37. Torneck CD, Titley KC, Smith DO, Adibfar A. Effect of water leaching the adhesion of composite resin to bleached and unbleached bovine enamel. J Endod. 1991 Apr;17(4):156-60. Pubmed PMID: 1940734.
  38. Truman J. Bleaching of non-vital discoloured anterior teeth. Dent Times. 1864;1:69-72.
  39. Walton RE, Rotstein I. Bleaching discolored teeth: internal and external. Principles and practice of endodontics. 1996;2:385.
  40. Watts AM, Addy M. Tooth discolouration and staining: a review of the literature. British dental journal. 2001 Mar 24;190(6):309-16.

         Indexed in

pubhub  CGS  indexcoop  
j-gate  DOAJ  Google_Scholar_logo

       Total Visitors

SciDoc Counter

Get in Touch

SciDoc Publishers
16192 Coastal Highway
Lewes, Delaware 19958
Tel :+1-(302)-703-1005
Fax :+1-(302)-351-7355
Email: contact.scidoc@scidoc.org


porn